Okay, so let’s talk about this thing I tried out recently, this “Rune Thompson Prediction” idea I bumped into.
Getting Started
So, I was browsing some forums, you know, the usual places where people share tips and tricks. Someone mentioned this “Rune Thompson Prediction” method. Sounded kinda interesting, maybe a bit mystical, but the way they talked about it made it seem like a practical thing for forecasting, maybe for simple trends or something. Didn’t give a lot of detail, just the name.
First thing I did, obviously, was try to look it up. Typed “Rune Thompson Prediction” into the search bar. Honestly? Not much came up. A few scattered mentions, nothing solid. No official guide, no paper, just chatter. That should’ve maybe been a red flag, but hey, sometimes the best stuff is hidden, right? Or so I thought.
Trying It Out
I pieced together what little I could find. It seemed to involve looking at past patterns, but in a very specific, almost ritualistic way. The “Thompson” part seemed key, maybe some kind of specific calculation or weighting he came up with.
Here’s what I actually did:
- Gathered Data: I grabbed some simple data I had lying around. Just some daily numbers from a personal project, nothing fancy. Thought I’d try to predict the next week’s numbers.
- Applied the ‘Method’: Based on the fragmented info, I tried to identify ‘runes’ in the data. Not actual runes, mind you, but specific patterns or thresholds mentioned in the forum posts. It felt a bit like reading tea leaves in a spreadsheet. I assigned some weights based on what one post vaguely suggested Thompson did.
- Calculated: Did some basic math, averaging, weighting. Nothing complex, because the instructions I found were super basic. It felt way too simple to be called a specific ‘prediction’ method.
What Happened
So, I got my predictions for the next week. Wrote them down. Waited. Tracked the actual numbers.
And the result? Total garbage. Seriously, my predictions weren’t just off, they were wildly off. Like, worse than just guessing randomly. One day the prediction was high, the actual was low. Next day, the opposite. No rhyme or reason.
It became pretty clear this “Rune Thompson Prediction” thing, at least from what I could gather, was either:
- Completely made up by someone online.
- Based on a real method so poorly explained that it’s useless.
- Maybe specific to some super niche thing that my data didn’t fit at all.
Final Thoughts
Honestly, it was a bit of a waste of time, but a good reminder. You see these names and methods thrown around online, sounding all official or clever. But unless you can find solid info, a real source, it’s often just noise. Someone probably just mashed a name and a concept together.
So, yeah. My practical experience with the Rune Thompson Prediction? It doesn’t predict much. Stick to the methods you actually understand and can verify. That’s my takeaway from this little experiment. Back to basics, I guess.
